User talk:Zxcvbnm
Index
|
||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Zxcvbnm. |
File:Misericorde Volume One screenshot.png listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Misericorde Volume One screenshot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука13 08:09, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Penny Arcade's On the Rain-Slick Precipice of Darkness 3 and 4
[edit] Hello, Zxcvbnm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Penny Arcade's On the Rain-Slick Precipice of Darkness 3 and 4, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
RE: Bastion (Overwatch)
[edit]I've been going through and trying to compile sourcing on which Overwatch characters could be viably spun out from the character list, and I do think a viable avenue could be considered for Bastion. Mentioning this as a courtesy because you had initially AfD'd it, but looking at the sources on my sandbox while a good bit is about gameplay, I think I can frame it in a way that illustrates the character as an examination of their game mechanics, especially with the PC Gamer sources that does a deep dive comparing him to TF2's engineer. Additionally, there's the PTSD angle also, which both Fanbyte and player.one (a Newsweek owned source) go into depth on.
Do you think this could be more viable with that considered? Kung Fu Man (talk) 13:13, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Hidden City: Hidden Object Adventure
[edit]Hello, Zxcvbnm.
Sorry for bothering, but I wanted to reach out as this is my first article: Draft:Hidden_City:_Hidden_Object_Adventure. You left a message: "Not seeing sufficient reviews to pass WP:GNG here." Could you kindly clarify if there are any reliable references in my list that could be used? Additionally, could you let me know how many good references are typically needed to pass the review? I frankly thought that the references I have are a good start for publishing the article.
Thank you for your assistance! DaniKro (talk) 07:59, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Ask.com review doesn't count towards being an RS due to being AI generated. Most of the other ones are either unreliable or simply mention the game as a trivial mention. Usually, something like Metacritic is the place to go to search for significant coverage, but in this case it has very few reviews besides Softonic, which just isn't enough. Usually about 3 are needed. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:39, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Replaceable non-free use File:PhoenixWright.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:PhoenixWright.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 999real (talk) 18:17, 11 March 2025 (UTC)